RevOps Data Strategy: Building the Single Source of Truth

Your data problem is a strategy problem

Every RevOps team inherits the same situation. Marketing has one definition of a qualified lead. Sales has another. CS tracks renewals in a spreadsheet that nobody else can access. The CRM has 40,000 accounts, 12,000 of which are duplicates, and the CEO wants to know why the board deck shows different pipeline numbers than the VP of Sales presented yesterday.

The instinct is to fix the symptoms: deduplicate the database, standardize a few fields, run a data enrichment project. Those are useful tactical moves. But without a data strategy underneath them, you are cleaning up a mess that will re-create itself within two quarters.

Gartner research estimates that poor data quality costs organizations at least $12.9 million per year. For revenue teams specifically, the cost shows up as misrouted leads, inaccurate forecasts, territory disputes based on wrong account data, and marketing campaigns targeting the wrong segments. Each of those is a revenue leak, and the leaks compound.

This post covers how to build a RevOps data strategy from the ground up: the architecture, the governance model, the integration framework, and the operational cadence that keeps it working over time. If you are responsible for revenue operations at your company, your data strategy is the foundation that every other initiative depends on.

---

What "single source of truth" actually means

The phrase "single source of truth" gets used loosely. For most teams it means "we wish our data was consistent." In practice, building a single source of truth (SSOT) requires three specific things.

One authoritative system per data domain

An SSOT does not mean one system for everything. It means one designated system of record for each type of data. The CRM is the system of record for accounts, contacts, and opportunities. The marketing automation platform is the system of record for campaign engagement and lead scoring. The billing system is the system of record for revenue and contract data.

When data exists in multiple systems (and it always will), the system of record wins. If Salesforce says the account is in healthcare and the enrichment tool says it is in financial services, Salesforce is right until someone updates it. That clarity eliminates the "which number is correct?" conversations that waste hours every week.

Shared definitions across functions

A "qualified lead" must mean the same thing in marketing's dashboard, sales' pipeline report, and the board deck. An "active customer" must use the same criteria whether CS, finance, or the CEO is asking. A "closed-won" opportunity must follow the same rules regardless of which rep closes it.

This sounds obvious. In practice, most companies have never written down their definitions, and each team has evolved slightly different interpretations over time. The RevOps team owns the glossary. Every metric, lifecycle stage, and status field gets a written definition that all functions agree to. When someone proposes a new metric, it goes through the same definition process.

A governed process for changes

Data definitions, field configurations, and integration logic should not change without review. When a sales manager adds a new picklist value to a field in Salesforce, that change can cascade through reports, routing rules, and downstream systems. Without a governance process, these ad-hoc changes accumulate into the same data mess you just cleaned up.

---

The RevOps data architecture

A data strategy needs an architecture: a deliberate design for how data flows between systems, who owns each domain, and where transformations happen.

The core systems layer

Every B2B revenue tech stack has a core layer of systems that generate and store the data your revenue team depends on:

CRM (Salesforce, HubSpot). System of record for accounts, contacts, leads, opportunities, and activities. The CRM is the gravitational center of RevOps data. Every other system either pushes data into it or pulls data from it.

Marketing automation (Marketo, HubSpot, Pardot). System of record for campaign engagement, email activity, lead scoring, and marketing-qualified lead criteria. Data flows from the MAP to the CRM when leads are created or updated, and from the CRM back to the MAP for audience segmentation.

Customer success platform (Gainsight, ChurnZero, Totango). System of record for customer health scores, adoption metrics, and renewal forecasts. Data flows from the CRM (account and opportunity data) and from the product (usage telemetry).

Billing and finance (Stripe, Zuora, NetSuite). System of record for contract value, payment status, and recognized revenue. This is the source of truth for "how much revenue did this customer actually generate," which is often different from what the CRM's opportunity amount says.

The enrichment and intelligence layer

Sitting alongside the core systems are tools that enhance your data:

Data enrichment (ZoomInfo, Clearbit, Apollo). Fills in firmographic and contact data: industry, employee count, revenue range, tech stack, job titles. Enrichment data flows into the CRM and MAP to power segmentation, scoring, and routing.

Intent and engagement data (6sense, Bombora, G2). Provides signals about which accounts are actively researching your category. This data feeds scoring models and can influence routing priority.

Conversation intelligence (Gong, Chorus). Captures and analyzes sales conversations. This data enriches opportunity records with qualitative signals that CRM fields alone cannot capture.

The analytics layer

The analytics layer pulls data from the core and enrichment systems to produce the dashboards, reports, and insights that drive decisions:

BI and reporting (Looker, Tableau, CRM-native reporting). Where your RevOps metrics actually get consumed. The analytics layer should pull from a single data model (the warehouse or the CRM) rather than aggregating directly from multiple source systems.

Data warehouse (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift). For organizations with enough data volume and analytical complexity, a warehouse serves as the integration point where data from all systems is standardized, joined, and made available for analysis. The warehouse doesn't replace the CRM as the operational system of record, but it becomes the analytical system of record.

The integration layer

The integration layer connects everything:

Native integrations. Direct connections between platforms (Salesforce-to-HubSpot, Marketo-to-Salesforce). These are the most reliable and lowest-maintenance option when available.

Middleware (Workato, Tray.io, Zapier). Handles connections between systems that don't have native integrations, or where native integrations don't support the data flows you need. Middleware also handles transformation logic: mapping fields, converting formats, and applying business rules during data transfer.

Reverse ETL (Census, Hightouch). Pushes data from your warehouse back into operational systems. If your scoring model runs in the warehouse, reverse ETL sends the scores back to Salesforce where reps can see them.

The architecture principle: data should flow in defined, documented paths. When you cannot trace how a data point gets from System A to System B, you have an integration gap that will eventually produce data inconsistencies.

---

Building the data governance model

Data architecture tells you how data flows. Data governance tells you who owns it, who can change it, and what happens when something goes wrong.

Data ownership by domain

Assign clear ownership for each data domain. Ownership means accountability for data quality, not just administrative access:

When a data quality issue surfaces (and it will, constantly), the owner is responsible for diagnosing the root cause and fixing it. This is not optional extra work. It is core to the role.

Field-level governance

Not every field in your CRM needs the same level of control. Apply governance proportionally:

Locked fields. Fields that drive routing, reporting, or compensation should be locked from manual edit by reps. Examples: territory assignment, lead source (original), opportunity stage (if automated), account owner. Changes to locked fields go through an approval process or are controlled by automation.

Managed fields. Fields that reps can edit but that have defined picklist values, validation rules, or formatting requirements. Examples: industry, deal stage, close date, next steps. Managed fields have guardrails but don't require approval for every change.

Open fields. Free-text fields where reps can enter whatever they need. Examples: notes, meeting summaries, custom context. These fields are useful for qualitative data but should never be used as inputs to automated processes (routing, scoring, reporting) because free text is inherently inconsistent.

For a deeper dive into getting reps to actually comply with data standards, see getting reps to comply with CRM data standards.

Change management for data

When someone wants to add a field, change a picklist value, modify an integration, or update a definition, it should go through a lightweight review process:

1. Request. The requester documents what they want to change and why.
2. Impact assessment. The data owner (usually RevOps) evaluates the downstream impact. Will this break any reports? Does it affect routing or scoring? Does it change how a metric is calculated?
3. Approval. If the impact is low, the owner approves. If the impact touches multiple systems or functions, it goes to a weekly data governance review.
4. Implementation. The change is made in a documented, traceable way.
5. Communication. Affected teams are notified of the change and any action they need to take.

This process sounds bureaucratic. It is not. It takes 10 minutes for routine changes and prevents the data drift that forces painful cleanup projects every six months.

---

The data quality operating cadence

A data strategy is not a project with an end date. It is an ongoing operating discipline. Here is the cadence that keeps data clean over time.

Daily: Automated monitoring

Set up automated alerts for common data quality failures:

• Leads created without required fields (company name, email domain, lead source)
• Opportunities with close dates in the past that are still open
• Duplicate account creation above a threshold (more than X duplicates per day)
• Integration sync failures between CRM and MAP or CRM and enrichment tools
• Routing failures where leads could not be assigned

These alerts should go to the data owner for triage. Most are false positives or one-offs. But the ones that aren't are the early warnings that prevent larger problems.

Weekly: Pipeline and lead data review

During the weekly pipeline review, add a data quality check:

• Are opportunity amounts populated and reasonable?
• Are close dates current (not pushed indefinitely into the future)?
• Are new leads being enriched and scored within the expected timeframe?
• Are any routing queues backed up due to data issues?

This takes 10 minutes and catches problems that automated monitoring misses because they require business context to identify.

Monthly: Metric definition audit

Review the core metrics you report to leadership:

• Pull the same metric from two different systems or reports. Do they match? If not, diagnose why.
• Check whether any metric definitions have drifted from the documented standard (for example, a dashboard filter that was changed by someone and never changed back).
• Review any new fields or picklist values added in the last month. Were they added through the governance process?

Quarterly: Full data health assessment

Run a comprehensive data quality assessment:

• Completeness. What percentage of account, contact, and opportunity records have all required fields populated? Target: 90%+ for critical fields.
• Accuracy. Sample 100 records and verify key fields (industry, employee count, address) against external sources. What percentage are correct? Target: 85%+.
• Duplicates. How many duplicate accounts and contacts exist? What is the duplicate creation rate (new duplicates per month)? Is it trending up or down?
• Freshness. What percentage of contact records have been verified or updated in the last 12 months? B2B contact data decays at roughly 22-30% per year due to job changes, company changes, and email address turnover. If you are not actively refreshing your data, nearly a quarter of your database is wrong at any given time.

Use the quarterly assessment to prioritize cleanup initiatives and justify investments in enrichment, deduplication, or additional governance tools. For a step-by-step approach, see the CRM data audit checklist.

---

Breaking down data silos between revenue teams

Data silos are the single biggest obstacle to a functioning RevOps data strategy. They form naturally: each function buys its own tools, defines its own fields, and builds its own reports. Breaking them requires deliberate effort.

The shared data model

Build a data model that spans functions. At minimum, this means:

Unified account hierarchy. One account record per company, with parent-child relationships for subsidiaries and divisions. Marketing, sales, and CS all reference the same account. If marketing is targeting "Acme Corp" while sales has three separate records for "Acme," "Acme Corp," and "ACME Inc.," your attribution, routing, and territory data are all wrong.

Consistent lifecycle stages. A single lead-to-customer lifecycle that all functions agree on: Lead, MQL, SAL, SQL, Opportunity, Customer, Churned. Each stage has written entry criteria. Marketing's definition of MQL and sales' expectations of what an MQL looks like must match. If they don't, fix this before building anything else.

Common segmentation. If marketing segments by industry and company size, sales territories should use the same industry and size definitions. If marketing calls it "healthcare" and sales calls it "health sciences" and CS calls it "medical," you have three segments that should be one.

The handoff data contract

Every handoff between teams is a data handoff. When marketing passes a lead to sales, what data accompanies it? When sales converts an opportunity to CS, what fields transfer?

Document the data contract for each handoff:

• Marketing to Sales (MQL handoff). Required fields: company name, contact info, lead source, lead score, product interest, engagement history. Routing depends on this data being complete and accurate. See lead routing best practices for how data quality directly impacts routing effectiveness.
• Sales to CS (closed-won handoff). Required fields: account details, contract value, contract dates, primary contact, implementation requirements, any commitments made during the sales process.
• CS to Sales (expansion handoff). Required fields: account health score, usage data, expansion opportunity details, customer contact for the expansion conversation.

If the handoff data is incomplete, the receiving team starts at a disadvantage. The data contract makes expectations explicit and gives the receiving team the ability to reject handoffs that don't meet the standard.

---

Data strategy and your routing infrastructure

Data strategy and lead routing are deeply connected. Every routing decision depends on data: territory assignments require accurate firmographic data, skills-based matching requires enriched lead attributes, and capacity-based routing requires real-time pipeline data.

When your data strategy is weak, routing breaks in predictable ways:

• Missing firmographic data means territory routing cannot determine which region a lead belongs to. The lead either misroutes or falls into a catch-all queue.
• Stale account ownership means account-based routing sends leads to reps who no longer own the account, or to reps who left the company months ago.
• Inconsistent industry tagging means skills-based routing cannot match healthcare leads to healthcare-specialist reps because the lead says "Health Care" and the routing rule looks for "Healthcare."
• Incomplete enrichment means lead scoring underscores high-value leads because the scoring model depends on fields that were never populated.

The fix is not more routing rules. The fix is better data feeding the routing rules that already exist. If your CRM data hygiene is poor, no routing tool will compensate. Clean data in, clean routing out.

---

Measuring your data strategy

Track these metrics to evaluate whether your data strategy is working:

Data completeness rate. Percentage of records with all critical fields populated. Track by object (accounts, contacts, opportunities) and by field. Target: 90%+ for fields that drive routing, scoring, and reporting.

Duplicate rate. Percentage of records that are duplicates. Track both the current duplicate count and the monthly creation rate. A decreasing creation rate means your prevention mechanisms (deduplication on entry, matching rules) are working.

Integration uptime. Percentage of time your critical integrations (CRM-MAP, CRM-enrichment, CRM-billing) are syncing successfully. Target: 99%+. Even brief sync failures can create data inconsistencies that take days to diagnose.

Time to data availability. How quickly does a new lead's data become complete and actionable? If a lead submits a form and it takes 24 hours for enrichment, scoring, and routing to complete, your speed-to-lead is 24 hours regardless of how fast your reps respond. Target: under 5 minutes from form submission to enriched, scored, and routed.

Metric consistency. How often do the same metrics pulled from different systems or reports match? If your pipeline number from Salesforce doesn't match your pipeline number from your BI tool, you have a data consistency problem. Track and close these gaps.

---

Start with the foundation, not the tools

The most common mistake in RevOps data strategy is buying tools before building the foundation. An enrichment vendor cannot fix data that has no governance model. A BI platform cannot produce reliable dashboards from inconsistent source data. A routing engine cannot make good assignment decisions with incomplete lead records.

Start with definitions. Then ownership. Then governance. Then architecture. Then tools.

The organizations that get data right don't have more tools or bigger budgets than everyone else. They have a strategy that treats data as infrastructure rather than an afterthought, and an operating cadence that keeps the infrastructure maintained.

At RevenueTools, we are building the routing and territory layer that depends on clean, well-governed data to function. Our tools are designed to surface data quality problems (missing fields, stale assignments, unmatched accounts) at the point of routing, so you catch issues before they become misrouted leads. That is what we mean by "built by operators": tools that assume your data is imperfect and help you improve it in the flow of work rather than in quarterly cleanup sprints.